function pointers - whats wrong ???
Sven at rufus.central.de
Sun Feb 9 13:26:00 CET 1997
Am 07.02.97 um 16:07
sagtest Du zum Thema "Re: function pointers - whats wrong ???":
> > It's possible to speed up the standard compilation of gpc for my pentium?
> > What's the floating point type of gpc's complex numbers?
> G:\DJGPP\BIN> stubedit ld.exe
> Size of real-memory transfer buffer [...]: 64k
Yeah, it runs better.
> > I'm working on a direct GRX20-Unit (contexts, mouse, ...) but I don't know
> > if it's needed by anybody else me.
> I would really prefer to work with a direct GRX20 Unit because I expect
> it to be more powerful than Borland's "BGI" interface. So please go on
> with it! :-)
I do it.
You also still working on the GPC-TurboVision ???
I try to make some GUI-Parts for my fractal program using the grx20, it
would be great if we could do the tv-funcionality for text and grafix.
> However I join Sven in asking: Anybody is using Objects with GPC?
I'm implemented the first parts of my GUI without objects, but everybody
knows that a gui is a thing should be made strictly using objects...
> I am thinking about improving object functionality, but if I am the
> only one who uses them, it's not worth the effort because GPC's objects
> essentially meet my needs like they are right now.
Also I think about to implement the different fractal types and color mode
types as objects. IMHO it's more easy to classify the different types and
to handle the sources. I'm only will using the objects for this part if I
dont lose lots of speed (I think 5% it's worth).
BTW: GPC is'nt perfect and this will take a long time too but I like it in
spite of that.
,____)) V E N I
More information about the Gpc