BP OOP problem
ih8mj at fjf.gnu.de
Tue May 25 21:47:15 CEST 2004
Neil Santos wrote:
> On 19:18 25/05/04, Frank Heckenbach wrote:
> > > Oh, oh... While we're on the subject of objects, may we PLEASE have
> > > private, public and protected?
> > >
> > > Oh, wait... There's a new release. Is it in there?
> > It's been already in 20030830 (and possibly some releases before
> > that, don't remember exactly).
> No, I mean actually implemented, not just being `syntatically accepted
> but ignored',
I also mean this. I checked it now, it was implemented in 20030507.
> quoting the manual.
OK, in one chapter of the manual it wasn't updated. I'll do this
now. (If you have such reports in the future, please include a
precise reference so I know what you're referring to.)
Frank Heckenbach, frank at g-n-u.de, http://fjf.gnu.de/, 7977168E
GPC To-Do list, latest features, fixed bugs:
GPC download signing key: 51FF C1F0 1A77 C6C2 4482 4DDC 117A 9773 7F88 1707
More information about the Gpc