thanks plus question: "egcs or gcc"

Jo Dillon jo at
Wed Sep 6 17:35:51 CEST 2000

On Wed, Sep 06, 2000 at 05:03:43PM +0000, Eike Lange wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 06, 2000 at 02:28:22PM +0200, Jo Dillon wrote:
> >   I'd just like to add that Qt is, as you've probably seen on slashdot,
> > now available under a free (GPL) license for developing free software.
> > For developing non-open-source software you have to pay for a Unix license,
> > however.
> Yes, but it is not LGPL.

  No, it's not under the Lesser GPL. That's why you need to pay to develop
proprietary software.



More information about the Gpc mailing list