About GPC's support of func/proc

[Neil Santos]

Frank Heckenbach wrote:

 >> quoted an e-mail from a CBFalconer that I don't seem to have received.
 >
 >
 > Maybe somethihng like this?
 > http://gnu-pascal.de/crystal/gpc/en/mail9822.html


No, not really; my spam protection consists entirely of the Bayesian 
system in Mozilla.  And besides, the only real spam I get annoyed with 
are those non-topic-related posts in the mailing lists I subscribe to. :)

 > Otherwise there might have been a (temporary?) mail transport
 > problem. You can always use the archives. If there seems to be a


Could be.  Either that, or Mozilla tagged CBFalconer's message as Junk 
and forgot to tell me about it.  There's some mystic voodoo stuff 
involved in making SeaMonkey behave under GNU/Linux, it seems.

 > You figured it out already. Actually you can omit `Self.' (within

...

 > often happens within a `with' clause with an object of the same or
 > "similar" type).


Ah.  I have to remember that.

 >> RTFM'ing wasn't much help (`Self' is still under construction), and
 >
 >
 > The incomplete reference manual is one of the biggest "bugs"
 > currently. If you like to help, any contribution is welcome.


I would, and I do.  But right there are some things that's further up my 
To-Do list, if you take my meaning.

Thanks again. :)

-- 
- Neil Santos                    Freelance Programmer & Web Designer   -
- http://nsantos.f2o.org/                     Free Software advocate   -

-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.12
GAT d+@ s+:+ a? C++++ UL*++++ P++ L++ E--- W+++(--) N-- !o !K w(++) !O
M-- V? PS++ PE-- Y++ PGP+ t* 5-- X- R++ tv+ b++>+++ DI+++ D--- G e>+++++
h r++ y?
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------

Please avoid sending me attachments encoded in secret formatting.
See http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html