Why no schema alias?
jmichael_ll at yahoo.com
Wed Aug 22 04:58:11 CEST 2012
> On 13 Aug 2012 at 10:31, Jay Michael
> > type LSTRING = STRING ;
> > t3.pas:8: warning: missing string capacity -- assuming 255
> > Is there some other syntax to creating an alias
> > of a schema type?
I found a "Changes List" that includes the following:
# 19980722: don't allow type y(b:integer)=array[1..b] of integer;x=y; in --extended-pascal (fjf115a.pas)
# 19980405: allow type y(b:integer)=array[1..b] of integer; x=y; (fjf115.pas)
Why was STRING singled out as not allowed to have an alias?
More information about the Gpc